吴瑞萍,陈兴杰
Rachel GOH,Kelvin Heng Kiat TAN

• 1:新加坡英语学院
• 2:新加坡国立教育学院学习科学与评估学术组

摘要(Abstract)：

评估反馈是教师评估素养的一个重要方面，可以从三个相互关联的维度理解此概念：教师对评估反馈的理解，评估反馈的课堂实践，以及教师如何处理学生参与评估过程中所产生的各种情绪（Pastore&Andrade, 2019）。本研究运用现象学研究方法，探讨了15名新加坡教师对评估反馈的理解与实践。借鉴变异理论的观点，本研究从访谈数据的分析得出了教师对于评估反馈的五种诠释，揭示了教学中的评估反馈并非专属教师的输出，而是师生之间探讨评估反馈的过程。教师对于评估反馈的理解能够从他们提供的不同性质的反馈中体现出来。本文建议将教师提供的评估反馈分成五类，最基础的为强调学生错误的反馈，最理想的为促进学生进行反思的反馈。调查结果显示，教师可以根据教学环境和学生的不同需求，调整评估反馈的性质与作用。本文也讨论了研究结果对于发展教师评估素养的意义，以帮助教师审查他们对评估反馈概念的理解，并希望能帮助教师加强评估反馈的实践，使评估反馈的使用不局限于提高学术表现这一层次，而是使评估反馈成为提升学生自我调节能力的途径。
Assessment feedback is an important aspect of teacher assessment literacy which can be understood along three interrelated dimensions: conceptual in terms of conceptions teachers have of feedback, praxeological regarding feedback practice, and socio-emotional which relates to how teachers attend to the emotional dynamics of assessment from the students' perspective(Pastore & Andrade, 2019). This paper presents the findings of a phenomenographic study involving 15 teachers in Singapore schools that explored their qualitatively different ways of experiencing assessment feedback. Drawing on the variation theory perspective, the analysis of interview data resulted in five teachers' conceptions of assessment feedback that shed light on the non-static nature of feedback engagement. These conceptions represent the variation in teachers' qualitatively different ways of experiencing assessment feedback, and ranged from feedback as inspection of students(emphasizing mistakes) to feedback as introspection for students(emphasizing reflection on feedback). The findings show the potential that teachers can aspire to move from level to level, depending on contexts and students. Insights on the continuum of teacher assessment feedback literacy are drawn. Implications for developing teacher assessment literacy are discussed to assist teachers in reviewing their conceptions of assessment feedback beliefs and enhancing assessment feedback practices beyond improving academic learning.

关键词(KeyWords)： 评估反馈;教师评估素养;促进学习评估;反馈伙伴关系
assessment feedback;teacher assessment literacy;assessment for learning;feedback partnership

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): funded by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the Education Research Funding Programme (OER 02/19 KTHK)

作者(Author): 吴瑞萍,陈兴杰
Rachel GOH,Kelvin Heng Kiat TAN

参考文献(References)：

• Akerlind,G.S.(2005).Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods.Higher Education Research and Development,24,321-334.
• Arnot,M.,McIntyre,D.,Pedder,D.,&Reay,D.(2004).Consultation in the classroom:Developing dialogue about teaching and learning.Pearson.
• Bovill,C.,Cook‐Sather,A.,&Felten,P.(2011).Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches,course design,and curricula:Implications for academic developers.International Journal for Academic Development,16,133-145.https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
• Brown,G.T.L.,Harris,L.R.,&Harnett,J.(2012).Teacher beliefs about feedback within an assessment for learning environment:Endorsement of improved learning over student well-being.Teaching and Teacher Education,28(7),968-978.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.003
• Carless,D.,&Boud,D.(2018).The development of student feedback literacy:Enabling uptake of feedback.Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education,43(8),1315-1325.
• Carless,D.,Salter,D.,Yang,M.,&Lam,J.(2011).Developing sustainable feedback practices.Studies in Higher Education,36(4),395-407.
• Carless,D.,&Winstone,N.E.(2020).Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy.Teaching in Higher Education,28(1),150-163.https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
• Charteris,J.,&Thomas,E.(2017).Uncovering‘unwelcome truths’through student voice:Teacher inquiry into agency and student assessment literacy.Teaching Education,28(2),162-177.
• Ellsworth,E.(1992).Why doesn’t this feel empowering?Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy.In C.Luke&J.Gore(Eds.),Feminisms and critical pedagogy(pp.90-119).Routledge.
• Gore,J.(1992).What can we do for you?What can“we”do for“you”?Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy.In C.Luke&J.Gore (Eds.),Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp.54-73).Routledge.
• Han,F.,&Ellis,R.A.(2019).Using phenomenography to tackle key challenges in science education.Frontiers in Psychology,10,1414.
• Han,Y.,&Xu,Y.(2020).The development of student feedback literacy:The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,45(5),680-696.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545
• Hattie,J.,&Timperley,H.(2007).The power of feedback.Review of Educational Research,77(1),81-112.https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
• Hogan,D.,Chan,M.,Rahim,R.,Kwek,D.,Khin,M.A.,Loo,S.C.,&Luo,W.S.(2013).Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore.Review of Education,1,57-106.
• Loh,C.,&Liew,W.(2016).Voices from the ground:The emotional labor of English teachers’work.Teaching and Teacher Education,55,267-278.
• Marton,F.(1986).Phenomenography:A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality.Journal of Thought,21,28-49.
• Matthews,K.E.,Tai,J.,Enright,E.,Carless,D.,Rafferty,C.,&Winstone,N.(2021).Transgressing the boundaries of“students as partners”and“feedback”discourse communities to advance democratic education.Teaching in Higher Education.https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1903854
• Miles,M.B.,&Huberman,A.M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis(2nd ed.).Sage.
• Nash,R.,&Winstone,N.(2017).Responsibility-sharing in the giving and receiving of assessment feedback.Frontiers in Psychology,8,1519.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519
• Nicol,D.(2021).The power of internal feedback:Exploiting natural comparison processes.Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education,46(5),756-778.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
• Pastore,S.,&Andrade,H.L.(2019).Teacher assessment literacy:A three-dimensional model.Teaching and Teacher Education,84,128-138.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003
• Quinn,S.,&Owen,S.(2014).Freedom to grow:Children’s perspectives of student voice.Childhood Education,90(3),192-201.
• Rahmat,F.A.,&Wong,H.M.(2017,June).Analysing the nature of feedback in classrooms in Singapore.Paper presented at the Seventh Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference,Singapore.
• Sadler,D.R.(1989).Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.Instructional Science,18(2),119-144.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
• Shute,V.J.(2008).Focus on formative feedback.Review of Educational Research,78(1),153-189.https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
• Tan,K.H.K.(2009).Variation theory and the different ways of experiencing educational policy.Educational Research for Policy and Practice,8(2),95-110.
• Tan,K.H.K.(2013).A framework for Assessment for Learning:Implications for feedback practices within and beyond the gap.ISRN Education,1-6.
• Tan,K.H.K.(2022).The four boxes of assessment feedback literacy.Assessment for All Learners Bulletin,July2022.https://assessmentforall.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-four-boxes-of-assessment-feedback.html
• Tan,K.H.K.,&Wong,H.M.(2018).Assessment feedback in primary schools in Singapore and beyond.In A.A.Lipnevich&J.K.Smith(Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback(pp.123-144).Cambridge University Press.
• Tay,H.Y.,&Lam,K.W.(2022).Students’engagement across a typology of teacher feedback practices.Educational Research for Policy and Practice,21,1-19.
• To,J.(2022).Using learner-centered feedback design to promote students’engagement with feedback.Higher Education Research&Development,41(4),1309-1324.https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1882403
• Welty,E.,&Lundy,L.(2013).A children’s rights-based approach to involving children in decision making.Journal of Science Communication,12(3),C02.
• Wiliam,D.(2018).Feedback:At the heart of-but definitely not all of-formative assessment.In A.A.Lipnevich&J.K.Smith(Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback(pp.1-28).Cambridge University Press.
• Winstone,N.,Nash,R.,Parker,M.,&Rowntree,J.(2017).Supporting learners’agentic engagement with feedback:A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes.Educational Psychologist,52,17-37.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
• Yang,M.,&Carless,D.(2013).The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes.Teaching in Higher Education,18(3),285-297.
• Zumbrunn,S.,Marrs,S.,&Mewborn,C.(2016).Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback:A mixed methods study.Reading&Writing,29(2),349-370.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9599-3