孙丽娜;
Lina SUN;Nankai University;

• 1:南开大学外国语学院

摘要(Abstract)：

近年来，文学在第二语言和外语教学中的应用价值重新得到了认可。本研究调查了一所中国高中英语课程的阅读项目实施情况，旨在探索学生和教师的视角，以及教学策略。项目使用了英语图像小说，并在此基础上开展了一系列的读写活动，包括读者剧场，撰写反思日志，文学圈和显性词汇教学。此案例研究持续了4个月之久，收集了来自学生和教师参与者的质性数据，包括课堂观察、半结构性访谈、反思日志、学生作业和相关文件。在思辨读写的理论框架指导下，本研究发现，通过教师的显性教学和批判教学法的实施，大多数学生通过投入多模态读写活动和语言-文学整合的教学模式，发展了高阶阅读和思辨能力，包括多重视角、历史同理心和学习的主动性。此外，通过调查教师所遇到的挑战和困惑，本研究呼吁要重视教师的职业发展、职业培训和文学素养的提升，并为未来的研究和教学实践提供了借鉴和参考。
The benefits of using literature in second/foreign language instruction have been re-gaining recognition in recent years. This study investigates a reading program implemented by an experienced teacher in a Chinese high school, with the aim of exploring students' and teachers' perceptions, as well as possible pedagogical strategies. Graphic novels were used in the program,facilitated by such literacy activities as reader's theatre, keeping a reflection journal, literature circles, and explicit vocabulary teaching. This exploratory case study lasted for four months,collecting data from student and teacher participants, classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, reflection journals, artifacts, and relevant documents. Using the framework of a critical literacy approach to second/foreign language teaching, this study finds that with explicit teacher guidance and critical pedagogies, students developed high-order reading/thinking skills, multiple perspectives, historical empathy, and agency by engaging in multiliteracies practices through language-literature integration. Additionally, by highlighting some of the challenges and confusions teachers encountered, this study draws attention to the need for teacher training in the implementation of this pedagogical approach, alongside implications for future research and practice.

关键词(KeyWords)： 语言-文学融合;中学外语教育;学生视角;教师视角;案例研究
language-literature integration;secondary EFL education;students' perceptions;teachers' perceptions;case study

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): supported by Chinese Foundation of Foreign Language Education (ZGWYJYJJ11A088);; 2021 Special Scientific Research Project of Tianjin Educational Committee (Foreign Language Education,2021ZXWY-YB01)~~

作者(Authors): 孙丽娜;
Lina SUN;Nankai University;

参考文献(References)：

• Arizpe,E.,Farrell,M.,&McAdam,J.(2013).Opening the classroom door to children’s literature:Areview of research.In K.Hall,T.Cremin,B.Comber,&L.Moll (Eds.),International handbook of research on children’s literacy,learning and culture (pp.241-257).Wiley-Blackwell.
• Bland,J.(2013).Children’s literature and learner empowerment:Children and teenagers in English language education.Bloomsbury Academic.
• Bland,J.(2018).Using literature in English language education:Challenging reading for 8-18 year olds.Bloomsbury Academic.
• Bloemert,J.,Paran,A.,Jansen,E.,&van de Grift,W.(2019).Students’perspective on the benefits of EFLliterature education.The Language Learning Journal,47(3),371-384.
• Bomer,R.,&Bomer,K.(2001).For a better world:Reading and writing for social action.Heinemann.
• Braun,V.,&Clarke,V.(2006).Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2),77-101.
• Calafato,R.,&Paran,A.(2019).Age as a factor in Russian EFL teacher attitudes towards literature in language education.Teaching and Teacher Education,79,28-37.
• Carroli,P.(2008).Literature in second language education:Enhancing the role of texts in learning.Continuum.
• Cheung,A.,&Hennebry-Leung,M.(2020).Exploring an ESL teachers’beliefs and practices of teaching literary texts:A case study in Hong Kong.Language Teaching Research,(15),1-26.doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933447.
• Cho,G.,Choi,H.,&Krashen,S.(2005).Hooked on comic book reading:How comic books made an impossible situation less difficult.Knowledge Quest,33(4),32-34.
• Creswell,J.,&Poth,C.(2018).Qualitative inquiry&research design:Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.).Sage.
• Freire,P.(2008).Education for critical consciousness.Continuum.
• Gee,J.P.(2008).Social linguistics and literacies.Routledge.
• Gopalakrishnan,A.(2011).Multicultural children’s literature:A critical issues approach.Sage.
• Gorman,M.(2003).Getting graphic!Using graphic novels to promote literacy with preteens and teens.Linworth.
• Hall,G.(2015).Literature in language education.Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hall,G.(2016).Routledge handbook of ELT.Routledge.
• Hilton,M.,&Nikaleva,M.(2012).Contemporary adolescent literature and culture:The emergent adult.Ashgate.
• Jones,C.(2019).Literature,spoken language and speaking skills in second language learning.Cambridge University Press.
• Kornfeld,J.,&Prothro,L.(2005).Envisioning possibility:Schooling and student agency in children’s and young adult literature.Children’s Literature and Education,36,217-239.
• Kramsch,C.,&Kramsch,O.(2000).The avatars of literature in language study.Modern Language Journal,84(4),553-573.
• Lau,S.M.C.,Juby-Smith,B.,&Desbiens,I.(2017).Translanguaging for transgressive praxis:Promoting critical literacy in a multiage bilingual classroom.Critical Inquiry in Language Studies,14(1),99-127.
• Loewen,J.W.(1995).Lies my teacher told me:Everything your American history textbook got wrong.Simon&Schuster.
• Milosevic,O.(2017).The tiger’s wife-Promoting intercultural understanding.CLELE Journal,5(2),18-38.
• Montón,E.O.(2017).Using American coming-of-age stories in the ELT classroom.CLELE Journal,5(1),44-63.
• Morrison,T.(1994).The Nobel lecture in literature,1993.Chatto&Windus.
• Naji,J.,Subramaniam,G.,&White,G.(2019).New approaches to literature for language learning.Springer International Publishing AG.
• Nation,K.(2017).Nurturing a lexical legacy:Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill.Science of Learning,2(1),1-4.
• Nowell,L.,Norris,J.,White,D.,&Moules,N.(2017).Thematic analysis:Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,16(1),1-13.
• Paran,A.(2008).The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching:An evidencebased survey.Language Teaching,41(4),465-496.
• Rosenblatt,L.M.(2016).Literature as exploration.Modern Language Association.
• Saka,F.?.(2018).Views of pre-service English teachers on the role of literature in EFL classes.International Journal of Languages’Education and Teaching,6,138-148.
• Schwarz,G.(2002).Graphic novels for multiple literacies.Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy,46,262-265.
• Seixas,P.(1993).Theorizing historical consciousness.University of Toronto Press.
• Sleeter,C.E.,&Grant,C.A.(2002).Making choices for multicultural education:Five approaches to race,class and gender.John Wiley&Sons.
• Sun,X.(2020).An exploration of students’and teachers’perceptions of a two-year extensive reading program in a Chinese secondary school.The Reading Matrix:An International Online Journal,20(1),201-219.
• Tabachnick,S.(2009).Teaching the graphic novel.Modern Language Association of America.
• Teranishi,M.,Saito,Y.,&Wales,K.(2015).Literature and language learning in the EFL classroom.Palgrave Macmillan.
• Trites,R.(2014).Literary conceptualizations of growth:Metaphors and cognition in adolescent literature.John Benjamins.
• Tsang,A.,Paran,A.,&Lau,W.W.F.(2020).The language and non-language benefits of literature in foreign language education:An exploratory study of learners’views.Language Teaching Research,(10),1-22.doi:10.1177/1362168820972345
• Wallace,C.(2001).Critical literacy in the second language classroom:Power and control.In B.Comber&A.Simpson(Eds.),Negotiating critical literacies in classrooms(pp.209-228).Erlbaum.
• Yang,G.L.(2013).Boxers&Saints.First Second.
• Yin,R.K.(2018).Case study research:Design and method(6th ed.).Sage.
• Zhang,R.(2018).The study of extensive reading class in high school:Using young adult fiction as reading materials(Unpublished master’s thesis).Shanghai Normal University.